Blog entry by Katja Kolenc
Anyone in the world
Graphic images—scenes of violence, disaster, or suffering—can be powerful tools for revealing the reality of a crisis. They can raise awareness, spark public debate, and hold authorities accountable. But they also carry significant ethical risks. Sensational or repetitive use of violent imagery can cause trauma, reinforce stereotypes, or turn human suffering into spectacle.
Journalists must make difficult decisions: When is the use of graphic content justified? How much should be shown? And how can they ensure dignity for victims and respect for the communities affected? Ethical practice requires careful consideration of context, audience, and intention. Content warnings, blurring techniques, and thoughtful framing can reduce harm.
Importantly, journalists must ask whether publishing such images adds meaningful value to public understanding—or merely attracts clicks. Sensationalism undermines trust, while responsible reporting balances truth-telling with compassion. Young reporters developing their editorial judgement must remember that ethical journalism is not only about what is shown, but why and how it is shown.