Raya Tsvetkova

Most people do not think much about how reporters take notes, but the method a journalist chooses has a significant impact on the final article. Some rely on notebooks, others on audio recordings, and some use digital apps that transcribe speech in real time. Each method changes the dynamic of the interview.

A notebook can make interviews feel more personal and relaxed, but it may slow down the conversation. Important details can be missed if the reporter cannot write fast enough. Audio recordings capture everything, yet they can feel intimidating to sources who worry about saying the wrong thing. Digital transcription tools are convenient, but they sometimes misinterpret accents or emotional tone.

There is also the ethical side. Journalists must inform interviewees when recording, but the way they communicate this matters. A quick, casual mention at the start may not be enough. Some people need more explanation to feel comfortable.

Another ethical question involves what to include. Should every small detail be written down. Should the reporter record emotional moments even if the source hesitates. A good journalist considers not only what is said but whether capturing it respects the person speaking.

Some reporters write notes after leaving the interview. While this can help them reflect, memory is imperfect. Relying too heavily on recall risks introducing unintentional bias.

In the end, note taking is not just a technical task. It is part of the relationship between journalist and interviewee. The method should support accuracy while preserving trust and respect.